Supreme Court haiku blues
January 11, 2013
Who knew there was a Supreme Court Haiku Reporter? Here’s its analysis of the LA County Flood Control District case decided earlier this week (h/t Megan Herzog):
The flow of water
No discharge of pollutants
Within same river
–which, I have to say, I find pretty disappointing. In response, I offer my own. Not quite the trenchant analyses of my co-bloggers on this topic, but here goes:
Nine judges answer
A stormwater question that
No one had asked. Bleh.
Other offerings?
5 Comments
leave one →
Ninth Circuit messed up
NRDC a bit, too
SCOTUS still worst fail.
This one just emailed to me to be posted anonymously:
current swirls with oil
lazy river of concrete
try again below
LA River case
leads to Miccosukee blues
confounding experts
Gee! I wish we had
More environmental clerks
On the supreme court
Court improvises
Way to block river cleanup.
Sadly, no surprise.
In drafters’ favor
are permits interpreted?
Or just polluters’?