Skip to content

What Would Conservative Environmental Policy Look Like?

November 1, 2010

Edmund Burke -- Appalled By a High Discount Rate

Now that the Republican Party is set to take control of the House, and maybe the Senate, we might want to ask what we might mean by a “conservative” environmental policy.  I was thinking about this question the other day, and then by chance came across this passage from Russell Kirk’s major work, The Conservative Mind: From to Burke to Eliot.

First, here’s a little of Burke:

One of the first and most leading principles on which the commonwealth and its law are consecrated, is lest the temporary possessors and life-renters in it, unmindful of what they have received from their ancestors, or of what is due their posterity, should act as if they were the entire masters, that they should not think it among their rights to cut off the entail, or commit waste on the inheritance, by destroying at their pleasure the whole original fabric of their society, hazarding to leave to those who come afthe them a ruin instead of a habitation….

Suffice to say that Burke was no fan of a high discount rate.

Russell Kirk -- Closet Earth Day Supporter

And neither was Kirk.  In case you needed to put a finer point on it, Kirk comments:

If men are discharged of reverence for ancient usage, they will treat this world, almost certainly, as if it were their private property, to be consumed for their sensual gratification; and thus they will destroy in their lust for enjoyment the prosperity of future generations….The modern spectacle of vanihsed forests and eroded lands, wasted petroleum and ruthless mining…is evidence of what an age without reverence does to itself and its successors.

(Emphasis mine).  It’s important to note that Kirk had no use for libertarian conservatives; indeed, perhaps the only thing that libertarians and traditionalists like Kirk have in common is their abiding love for inequality.

But you might keep these quotes and ideas in mind the next time someone insists, as Ronald Reagan did, that the root of “conservative” comes from “conserve.”  We’ve come a long way from there.

3 Comments leave one →
  1. November 1, 2010 9:10 pm

    For starters, no more farm subsidies and no more off-street parking requirements. Following would probably be cutbacks to the National Flood Insurance Program and tax increment financing for big box stores, and expansions of Pay-As-You-Drive insurance and location-efficient mortgage lending policy. Or did you mean what would a Republican environmental policy look like? Because, unless you count Kerry-Graham-Lieberman, you’ve got me.

  2. jenclinton permalink
    November 2, 2010 11:59 am

    I heard Bill McKibben speaking on NPR last month about the RIDICULOUSNESS of the fact that some (most?) of the GOP is still denying even the existence of global warming. Conservatives are the people who support preserving our traditional rights and ways of life as Americans, and they don’t see the importance in preserving our environment, not even as a means to the former.

    YUCK.

Trackbacks

  1. Jane Jacobs, Edmund Burke, and the New Urbanism « The Reality-Based Community

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,223 other followers